Old 03-26-2007, 03:11 PM   #1
strikefour's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 30
Default poor image quality

i was trying something other than a wedge shot, so i tried framing with trees.
but i am having problems fine tuning the shot. at first it rejected for oversharpened (soften 8 points), then overexposured, then oversharpened again, and now this. it looks great on a 10x14.
the oversharpening rejections with my photos have suddenly appeared in the last month, when it was the opposite before. kind of confused why this happening
can this shot be saved? (wish there was some flowers on the bushes.)
strikefour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2007, 06:42 PM   #2
Joe the Photog
Senior Member
Joe the Photog's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 7,910

It does look over sharpened, which is a problem I have often. Look at the top of the lead loco. It looks rigid wherethe lines should be smooth. The grass looks over sharp as well. I like the idea behind the shot, but I would watch the sign in front of the back of the lead unit as well as the cement sticks in the ground. This might be a perfect spot to try out Mitch Goldman's step ladder to see if you can get over that.

Good try. I think this shot is slvageable.

Joe the Photog Dot Com
Joe the Photog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2007, 06:59 PM   #3
Senior Member
a231pacific's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 822


I like the shot, but it looks kind of harsh, like it was either over sharpened or local contrast was increased. Can you tell us about your digital workflow? How and when are you sharpening and what size is the image that you are submitting to RP?

It used to be that if you submitted a file that was too big, RP down-res'ed it automatically and the results weren't good. John West just noted that he's started seeing "zaggies" in some of his shots and he hasn't changed the way he's been doing anything either. I wonder if RP has changed their software since they moved to new servers and the compression that they are doing has changed.

Michael Allen
a231pacific is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 01:17 AM   #4
Save The Wave
Save The Wave's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 357
Send a message via MSN to Save The Wave

I was wondering what f stop you used and the EXIF shows f8.0 which should be adequate to get the foreground and background objects sharp.
It's a really nice compostion, hopefully you can rework the image and get it in.
You give me a golf cart, a 12 pack and a lake, I'll show you how to have fun all day - Comedian Greg Hahn

The good, the bad and the ugly. My railpics
Save The Wave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2007, 04:10 AM   #5
strikefour's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 30

Thank for the suggestions, some good things to look into so i figure out what happening. my workflow has been pretty simple with my photos: crop a bit, adjust brightness and contrast, and resize to 1023x682.
strikefour is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.