Old 05-06-2016, 04:30 AM   #1
Freericks
Met Fan
 
Freericks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,040
Default Composition Deficits

Is there an edit I'm not seeing that would make this work or is it hopeless?

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...90&key=9533324
Freericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 05:13 AM   #2
RobJor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 753
Default

I like the idea as the car ties in, but looks like high sun, the locos are obscured behind brush etc and the overall look is very flat which ie a middle of the day photo. Now if it was that person who usually posts all that stuff it would be accepted and get 10,000 views.

Looking for the bleached bone of that foamer car that was abandoned.

Bob
RobJor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 07:28 AM   #3
miningcamper1
Senior Member
 
miningcamper1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,221
Default

I like it (except for those ugly scenery-killers in the distance ).
__________________
flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/11947249@N03/

RP Photos: www.railpictures.net/miningcamper1/

Last edited by miningcamper1; 05-06-2016 at 07:36 AM. Reason: revision
miningcamper1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 01:32 PM   #4
Noct Foamer
Senior Member
 
Noct Foamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 571
Default

I like what you were after, and that is a seriously cool little railroad there. Somehow it just doesn't quite work from that angle. Another thought I had was to shoot it from inside the car, with a wide angle. Would either need careful fill flash or two exposure blend.


Kent in SD
Noct Foamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 02:42 PM   #5
KevinM
Senior Member
 
KevinM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,008
Default

Hi Charles,

Interesting scene. I would have no concerns about the high sun, nor do the wind turbines bother me. As the screener noted, the real issue is composition. IMHO as a definite "non-artiste", this composition isn't terrible. If I were going to try and resubmit, I might try going tighter on the top, bottom and right. I think the problem is that the train is distant enough to make the right side look somewhat empty.

The $64,000 question is whether or not you have other frames from different angles.....specifically, do you have anything shot from just a little further to your left that would allow you to get more train in a tighter frame, without getting any of the dreaded "merges", where elements appear to "touch"?

One of the live-and-learn lessons of photography is that the only shots you ever regret are the ones you don't take. Since pixels are a ton cheaper than film, whenever you come across a scene like this, it behooves you to shoot a bunch of angles. When you get 'em home and put 'em on a computer, you have more time to think and more material to play with. In the end, you can just hit DELETE on anything that just doesn't "work." I don't know how many times I've gotten home and thought: "Damn, if I had just shot it from this angle or that."
__________________
/Kevin

My RP stuff is here.

Link to my Flickr Albums. Lots of Steam Railroad stuff there from all over the US.
KevinM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 03:04 PM   #6
Freericks
Met Fan
 
Freericks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,040
Default

Kevin,

What about this angle?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	2016 04 30 060 Coyote Wells CA PIR wreck.jpg
Views:	241
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	9157  
Freericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 03:12 PM   #7
RobJor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freericks View Post
Kevin,

What about this angle?
Seems to take care of compo. Looks better for me. I would sure try.

Bob
RobJor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 03:17 PM   #8
KevinM
Senior Member
 
KevinM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freericks View Post
Kevin,

What about this angle?
I like it!

A couple of suggestions:

Perhaps crop 3:5 to take a little of the featureless foreground out of it. Also, the scene looks bright on this display (everything looks bright on the laptop I am using right this second), but you may want to play with highlights/brightness to ensure good contrast. There are a lot of light-colored elements in the scene.

I'd give it your best shot on the crop and the processing and go for it. The other angle gave more detail on the vehicle, but I think this one addresses the screener's concern.
__________________
/Kevin

My RP stuff is here.

Link to my Flickr Albums. Lots of Steam Railroad stuff there from all over the US.
KevinM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 05:58 PM   #9
Freericks
Met Fan
 
Freericks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,040
Default

Thanks so much - will work on it tonight.
Freericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 07:41 PM   #10
miningcamper1
Senior Member
 
miningcamper1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,221
Default

I agree with Kevin, but my go-to adjustment would be the gamma slider.

EDIT: Or maybe not. The result screams "high sun", although it made the sky a nice blue.
__________________
flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/11947249@N03/

RP Photos: www.railpictures.net/miningcamper1/

Last edited by miningcamper1; 05-06-2016 at 08:07 PM. Reason: revision
miningcamper1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 09:19 PM   #11
Freericks
Met Fan
 
Freericks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,040
Default

Gamma slider is the high-sun finder for sure. Highlights tool is much more forgiving.
Freericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:43 PM   #12
Noct Foamer
Senior Member
 
Noct Foamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 571
Default

If you ever get the chance to go back, I would try lowering the hood down on the car. Then, try shooting THROUGH the car and frame the engines.


Kent in SD
Noct Foamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 01:16 AM   #13
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

My view is that the first one is much better. Besides the obstructions on the train, I think I'd prefer seeing the entire second engine, plus the cut-off stone on the right margin is distracting. The second one is, to use the appropriate technical term, blah, by comparison. And too much space at the bottom.
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 02:51 AM   #14
Freericks
Met Fan
 
Freericks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,040
Default

I was originally with you, J, but the public spoke and didn't want it. They did want the bland one.

Image © Charles Freericks
PhotoID: 575620
Photograph © Charles Freericks
Freericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 02:54 AM   #15
Freericks
Met Fan
 
Freericks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,040
Default

Truth is I've seen many pics before with an old abandoned car up front and the train in the back and when I realized I could do it here, I got kind of happy. The hood being up? Yeah, if it weren't so far away I might drive there again and try and get it down. I did look at it at the time and there is nothing to latch the hood to anymore so the springs keep it up. It probably would have required some bailing wire and a lot more time to keep it down.
Freericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 03:02 AM   #16
KevinM
Senior Member
 
KevinM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMDC View Post
My view is that the first one is much better. Besides the obstructions on the train, I think I'd prefer seeing the entire second engine, plus the cut-off stone on the right margin is distracting. The second one is, to use the appropriate technical term, blah, by comparison. And too much space at the bottom.
I liked the first one too, but with the frame he had, the compo wasn't getting it done. The second frame may not have quite the impact, but Charles did a nice job processing it. He just put it up this evening and it is rapidly gathering hits on its own merit, not based on some cheap Facebook campaign. In another hour, it should walk right by both of the shots I put up nearly 24 hrs ago.

Nice job, Charles!
__________________
/Kevin

My RP stuff is here.

Link to my Flickr Albums. Lots of Steam Railroad stuff there from all over the US.
KevinM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 03:14 AM   #17
Freericks
Met Fan
 
Freericks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,040
Default

I'm sorry, Kevin. I hope I don't overtake them.
Freericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2016, 08:33 PM   #18
miningcamper1
Senior Member
 
miningcamper1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freericks View Post
I was originally with you, J, but the public spoke and didn't want it. They did want the bland one.

Image © Charles Freericks
PhotoID: 575620
Photograph © Charles Freericks
...and it's doing very well at #3 Top of 24.

BTW, why is it that attempts to revive this line seem to go nowhere?
Is it the jog in and out of Mexico that complicates matters?
__________________
flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/11947249@N03/

RP Photos: www.railpictures.net/miningcamper1/
miningcamper1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2016, 07:51 PM   #19
ShortlinesUSA
Senior Member
 
ShortlinesUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 821
Default

I would say the biggest issue is miles and miles of difficult infrastructure with no online traffic. That's an issue which has killed many a shortline over the years.
__________________
Mike Derrick

Shortline and Regional RR forum moderator
ShortlinesUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2016, 09:20 PM   #20
miningcamper1
Senior Member
 
miningcamper1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShortlinesUSA View Post
I would say the biggest issue is miles and miles of difficult infrastructure with no online traffic. That's an issue which has killed many a shortline over the years.
It would be among the more spectacular tourist train rides IMO.
__________________
flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/11947249@N03/

RP Photos: www.railpictures.net/miningcamper1/
miningcamper1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2016, 12:45 AM   #21
Ron Flanary
Senior Member
 
Ron Flanary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Big Stone Gap, VA
Posts: 1,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freericks View Post
Is there an edit I'm not seeing that would make this work or is it hopeless?

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...90&key=9533324

Why are you asking here? That's a helluva shot the way it is!! I wouldn't put a whole lot of stock in it being rejected here. It's just one person's opinion, that's all. How could you possibly call this shot "hopeless"?

If I had taken it, I would have uploaded it to one of the magazines----and skipped RP (with no disrespect to RP---just my opinion).
Ron Flanary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 04:32 PM   #22
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

Someone was not happy with Charles' efforts and decided further effort was needed

Image © EL ROCO Photography
PhotoID: 577115
Photograph © EL ROCO Photography
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 05:08 PM   #23
Freericks
Met Fan
 
Freericks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,040
Default

What's really funny about that Janusz is that I had other photos from that day rejected for "similar to previous" due not to my photos but El Roco's.
Freericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 05:55 PM   #24
ShortlinesUSA
Senior Member
 
ShortlinesUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 821
Default

If history repeats itself, 5 different angles of the shot will be posted over the next couple of weeks, all making it to the Top 24...
__________________
Mike Derrick

Shortline and Regional RR forum moderator
ShortlinesUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 06:13 PM   #25
miningcamper1
Senior Member
 
miningcamper1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,221
Default

It's a good abandoned SUV shot, for sure, but half a GP40 way in the background is enough rail content?
__________________
flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/11947249@N03/

RP Photos: www.railpictures.net/miningcamper1/
miningcamper1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.