Old 05-04-2010, 09:59 PM   #1
sd9
Senior Member
 
sd9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 799
Default sun to low?

after getting rejected for cropping, I backed out a bit but then then I got the poor lighting reject, so I am assuming it should be lit up better on the sides? (not glinty enough I guess) but then you would lose the orange glow, so, forget about it or lighten it up?
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...&key=208220658

Bill
sd9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 10:05 PM   #2
Arne H. B.
Senior Member
 
Arne H. B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 171
Default

Looks like the lighting is good to me, maybe there needs to be some light on the trucks and undercarriage?
Arne H. B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 10:22 PM   #3
asis80
Senior Member
 
asis80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,460
Send a message via AIM to asis80
Default

It's really not a strong enough glint "effect" for me. I'm not a huge fan of it at all, too much in your face, if you ask me. Looks like a dark shooting into the sun shot as it stands.

Ben
__________________
Trains.
asis80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2010, 10:35 PM   #4
ken45
LA&SL Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 700
Default

Ick...you nuked that one pretty good. Looks like you thought you could process out the problems in the original photo. Rather than trying to figure out what you did, I'll just say that this one is killed because the front of the locomotive doesn't pop from its surroundings, one of my cardinal rules for getting a decent glint wedgie.
__________________
My Railpictures Shots http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=2561
ken45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 01:55 AM   #5
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,838
Default

Bill, do you have a shot where the train is farther back and the rails are glowing, kind of like this?

Image © Jim Thias
PhotoID: 289891
Photograph © Jim Thias
__________________
.
Rhymes with slice, rice and mice, and probably should be spelled like "Tice."

This pretty much sums it up: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Thias
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 03:02 AM   #6
GIZMO
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sd9 View Post
after getting rejected for cropping, I backed out a bit but then then I got the poor lighting reject, so I am assuming it should be lit up better on the sides? (not glinty enough I guess) but then you would lose the orange glow, so, forget about it or lighten it up?
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...&key=208220658

Bill
Your pixel counts are getting pretty low at 211 kb. That suggests to me that you are losing pixels from "cropping." I use what I call "Zoom & Grab" which uses the full resolution of the monitor, giving lots bigger files and lots less data loss.

Are you using something like a 70-300 lens? Your EXIF data lists 70 mm focal length. (With Zoom & Grab you lose your EXIF reference.) I am a fan of lenses in the 18-200 or 18-270 class. With such a lens one could wait until the train was much closer and pop him with flash to show the part now back lit and still get the glint down the side. Nikon does a lot of song and dance about "fill flash" in their manuals but it’s best to just start experimenting when you want to bring out things in the shadows. From your lingo you seem to be an insider and I assume you get away with using flash without getting arrested, whatever the charges might be.

Discussion of “Zoom & Grab.”

I find ACDSEE as good as anything for viewing and organizing images. For example one merely needs draw a box around an area of interest and click inside it and that area immediately fills the screen. I have not met anybody who has seen anything slicker or quicker.

I keep CaptureWizPro sitting on the edge of my screen. Hit draw a box around the part of the screen of interest and the program grabs the image, gives it an ascending file name and that is it. There are other options too but that is slickest.

http://www.acdsee.com/support/products/acdsee/2009 $70 with 30 day free trial.

http://www.pixelmetrics.com/CapWizPro/index.htm $40 with 30 day free trial.

Both companies are easy to work with, being friendly and non-predatory.

I like the combination of these two programs to carry out what I call “Zoom & Grab” which results in little or no loss of pixels if done right, since one is using the entire screen, rather than the loss of pixels that occurs with “cropping.” I suspect cropping when different images on this site by the same viewer show lots of variation in file size and I suspect that in many cases “Zoom & Grab” would have resulted in better image quality.

In a similar vein, the fastest way to look at images on FLICKR seems to be in slide show format and these images yield nicely to reaching out and grabbing them with CaptureWizPro, since they do not respond the same way as .JPEG’s would, since they are in JAVA.
GIZMO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 03:27 AM   #7
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,838
Default

What the hell are you babbling about??
__________________
.
Rhymes with slice, rice and mice, and probably should be spelled like "Tice."

This pretty much sums it up: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Thias
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 03:29 AM   #8
GIZMO
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 27
Default Pixel counts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias View Post
What the hell are you babbling about??
Just trying to get his pixel counts up.
GIZMO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2010, 04:04 AM   #9
sd9
Senior Member
 
sd9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias View Post
Bill, do you have a shot where the train is farther back and the rails are glowing, kind of like this?

Image © Jim Thias
PhotoID: 289891
Photograph © Jim Thias
No, not this time, I was kinda going for the head silhouette, in the window thing, and was hoping for a little better light in that area, I like the point Ken brought up "killed because the front of the locomotive doesn't pop from its surroundings" have to keep that in mind for next time

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias View Post
What the hell are you babbling about??
I was thinking the same thing..I wonder if he read that part that said,
-- your photo will be slightly compressed and reduced in filesize automatically when you upload!
sd9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.