Old 01-09-2007, 01:27 PM   #1
UNDPilot
Member
 
UNDPilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: VA/MI
Posts: 63
Default Rejection, is it fixable?

What can I do to make the photos better?

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=325991

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreject.php?id=325990 - it seems each time I submit this one the rejection reason changes.
__________________
RailPictures.net photos http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=18763

RRPictureArchives.net photos http://wblanton.rrpicturearchives.net

Personal Rail Photo Website http://wesrail.myjalbum.net/Main
UNDPilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 01:41 PM   #2
Bill
Senior Member
 
Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 234
Default

My opinions:

1st one - needs a CW rotation...everything is leaning left. I personally like the composition, leaving the foreground light & the full smokestack is a nice touch.

2nd one - feels a bit claustrophobic...the crop on the right side is too tight. I assume those foreground sticks are going to hurt your chances as well.

Good luck,
Bill
Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 02:09 PM   #3
Railfan Ohio
Senior Member
 
Railfan Ohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fredericktown, Ohio
Posts: 334
Default

I agree with Bill, it needs a slight clockwise rotation and I like the foreground and smokestack. The screeners might not like them so it might help to crop off at the right about where the smokestack is. You might also take some off the top and bottom to keep the photo the same shape. Just don't take off too much off or the train will take up too much of the frame.

For the second one, I don't think you can do anything about the cloudy rejection, they just don't accept many of those.

Hope these comments help and good luck fixing them.

PS the engine is listed as a AC4400 in the first, and it appears to be an SD70M.
__________________
Andy Toms

B&O: the First, the Best
Pennsy: the Standard, but still #2

My pix:http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=11344
Railfan Ohio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 02:32 PM   #4
Ween
Senior Member
 
Ween's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,861
Default

Quote:
PS the engine is listed as a AC4400 in the first, and it appears to be an SD70M.
Not quite...ex-Conrail SD60M.

Same thoughts for the first one.

For the second one:
Quote:
it seems each time I submit this one the rejection reason changes.
As was discussed in another thread, the foreground clutter is the killer. Nothing you can do about it. Also, not sure if you're doing this or not, but uploading the same photo without making any changes to it is also a no-no. Make the changes to fix the rejection and try again. If you disagree with the rejection, use the appeal function. If the appeal gets rejected, then it's time to let it go...
__________________

Last edited by Ween; 01-09-2007 at 02:35 PM.
Ween is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2007, 08:46 PM   #5
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

I agree with Ween on the second one, but I would say it more strongly. Put it aside, it isn't getting in, bad light (flat, lifeless), foreground clutter, no matter the crop. Learn from this one, then let it go.
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.