Old 12-19-2016, 09:53 PM   #1
Daniel MINACA
Member
 
Daniel MINACA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: France
Posts: 59
Default Another example of bogus reason...

The rejected pictures explains themselves...

Cloudy:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...82&key=1389989
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...81&key=9817300
It is obvious that under a sheds there is no direct sun!

Poor Aesthetic Quality:
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...97&key=1991142
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...04&key=5483052

Any ideas ? I wonder if they are really visualized with a critical opinion and not too quickly...
__________________
My RPN pictures: Here

Last edited by Daniel MINACA; 12-19-2016 at 09:57 PM.
Daniel MINACA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2016, 01:23 AM   #2
conrail1990
Senior Member
 
conrail1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel MINACA View Post
It is obvious that under a sheds there is no direct sun!
I looked at it and my first thought was cloudy too. The design of the shed would make one think that there should be light coming through the top, but your explanation would suggest that is not the case. Also since there is no photo description. It would lend one to use their imagination as to what we are looking at. Which will hurt the chances of getting on, especially with low light conditions.

Now the image inside the cab overlooking the controls. I do believe that one should get on.
__________________
Evan Schilling
My Photos on RP.
My Photos for sale
conrail1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2016, 01:25 AM   #3
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by conrail1990 View Post
Now the image inside the cab overlooking the controls. I do believe that one should get on.
Poor use of the flash, so that may be why it got the PAQ.
__________________
.
Rhymes with slice, rice and mice, and probably should be spelled like "Tice."

This pretty much sums it up: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Thias
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2016, 03:19 AM   #4
conrail1990
Senior Member
 
conrail1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias View Post
Poor use of the flash, so that may be why it got the PAQ.
I was more focused on the controls but you're right.
__________________
Evan Schilling
My Photos on RP.
My Photos for sale
conrail1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2016, 04:25 AM   #5
ATSF666
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 127
Default

I like both of the shed photos, properly exposed and interesting material. I'm not so excited about either of the PAC photos.
__________________
ATSF666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2016, 06:04 PM   #6
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

The track complex shot is PEQ because the composition lacks a focal point. It needs a train, or something else that is a key spot in the image.
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.