Old 05-30-2017, 08:13 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 209
Default Comments welcomed


Many thanks Dave
baggydave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 11:38 PM   #2
Senior Member
miningcamper1's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 971

Well, RP had a chance to offer something different and blew it!

After contemplating this a little, I'd like to see more at the top (clerestory).
The shiny plastic runner on the floor is a bit annoying.
flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/11947249@N03/

RP Photos: www.railpictures.net/miningcamper1/
miningcamper1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 12:44 PM   #3
Joseph Cermak
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 275

Yeah I agree that it is something different and would be worth having in the database.
Joseph Cermak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 01:46 PM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 494

Very Nice, too bad.

Bob Jordan
RobJor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 02:55 PM   #5
MassArt Images
Senior Member
MassArt Images's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA area
Posts: 682

I think "they" are in wedgie mode at the present. Cool shot!

My RP pics are HERE

My website is HERE
MassArt Images is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 04:57 PM   #6
John West
Senior Curmudgeon
John West's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mill Valley, CA
Posts: 1,068

Interesting shot. The plastic runner is a bummer, but overall it has a lot of interest. Just another judgement call that went the wrong way, but that is life at RP.
John West
See my pix here and
here and here
John West is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 06:16 PM   #7
Senior Member
bigbassloyd's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,439

While I applaud the composition, I don't feel it was executed well enough. There's issues with the noise, sharpness, and highlights. Since this scene wasn't going anywhere it could have been done a bit better IMO. Not trying to be a ----, but offering input into a possible reason for it being rejected.

Loyd L.
If you've taken offense to something I've posted, then it's probably true...

American Rails dot com - A fantastic website with tons of information and photographs related to American railroads and locomotives.

Last edited by bigbassloyd; 05-31-2017 at 06:18 PM.
bigbassloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 07:08 PM   #8
Senior Member
KevinM's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,855

I would agree on the plastic floor mat. It obviously protects the carpet while allowing visitors to see car's interior, but for a photo, it doesn't do much for the ambience. Also would have been nice if that had been the Leviathan outside vs. a locomotive built much later. Not much you could have done about either of those things, Dave.


- A wider lens would have been better. I now carry the Nikkor 20mm f/1.8G with me wherever I go (unless I have the heavier 16-35mm f/4 VR with me) There are times when 24mm just can't take it all in.

- Using some bounce flash (dialed down) might have allowed you to expose for the open door, while keeping the rest of the cabin decently exposed. I nearly always have an SB-600 handy, with some Rogue Flash Benders for just such situations.

My RP stuff is here.

Link to my Flickr Albums. Lots of Steam Railroad stuff there from all over the US.
KevinM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 10:11 PM   #9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 209

Not much I could do about anything really. I was visiting late in the day and after I had been given the talk by the guide present in the car, the museum was closing up and he had to escort me from the premises. I couldn't make too much of a fuss as I had been given free entry. Also I don't carry a flash with me. Once I have packed the camera, two lenses and the battery charger I can't have much more in my suitcase!! As this time I was over for three weeks I needed more room for a few clothes. I've got another version which shows the ornate material on the roof but the chair is cropped so I didn't think it looked that good. Perhaps someone will go and take a better shot and get it on. It was strange watching how the screener worked though. I had recourse to edit what I had written and when I put the photo back on I noticed that pictures were being reviewed. This was number 12 in a list of 13. It then was 11 out of 12, then 10 out of 11 and so on. BUT once they got to 6 mine had already been rejected. Odd that.
baggydave is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.