Old 10-20-2019, 04:54 PM   #1
spacetrain1983
Senior Member
 
spacetrain1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 166
Default Okay then...

https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...35&key=9159170
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...36&key=5172417
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...39&key=3109803
https://www.railpictures.net/viewrej...41&key=5869104

Well, there's something unexpected.
CP one - took that just yesterday, I have several frames of this train at this location but thought this one was the best. Blurry? Yeah, I don't see it.

UP C44ACM one - well, I'll admit that I was a bit rushed in editing because I was trying to get it in before site midnight, but I thought it was good enough. I might need to just edit this one some more, and take more time...

Two SD70s - I thought that the mountain and grain elevator made neat scenery, but apparently the elevator is just clutter?

Yard job - again, maybe could use some extra editing, extra sharpening.
__________________
Believe it or not, I do try.
spacetrain1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2019, 07:31 PM   #2
Sean Mathews
Senior Member
 
Sean Mathews's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 102
Default

You know... I'm at the point where I don't even think they have real screeners, and its just some AI algorithm thing that get's fooled every now and then. Like for this one, the heat rising and causing the diffraction threw it off. Only thing that can explain it.
__________________
Astrophotographer, former award winning college photojournalist, and hopeless rail photographer.
Sean Mathews is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2019, 08:12 PM   #3
KevinM
Senior Member
 
KevinM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,008
Default

Spacetrain, despite the rejections, the quality of your photos is definitely improving. I think its just a matter of being a little more careful with photo locations and working on your editing skills. But I do see marked improvement over the stuff you were submitting even a year ago. Hopefully, at some point, the screeners will as well.

Keep at it!
__________________
/Kevin

My RP stuff is here.

Link to my Flickr Albums. Lots of Steam Railroad stuff there from all over the US.
KevinM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 12:59 PM   #4
bigbassloyd
Senior Member
 
bigbassloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hilldale, West Virginia
Posts: 3,735
Default

I agree with Kevins' input. There's definitely improvement in your photography. I think the most valid rejection is for number 3, as the composition could have been different to keep the silos out of the locomotive. The rest are leaning towards nitpicky to me.

Loyd L.
__________________
Social Media elevates the absurd and mediocre to a point where they aren't anymore, and that is a tragedy.

My personal photography site
bigbassloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 01:40 PM   #5
Joseph Cermak
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cleveland, Rochester, Erie
Posts: 386
Default

I could pretty much see all of these getting on with some additional editing. The rejections seem to be fixable ones and the shots are good overall.

For the grain silo one, do you have an earlier frame so that the silos would be next to the locomotives?
Joseph Cermak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 12:17 AM   #6
spacetrain1983
Senior Member
 
spacetrain1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 166
Default

I do have a later few shots, as the silo shot was actually DPUs. I'll try editing a bit more with the other three and see if that does the trick.
__________________
Believe it or not, I do try.
spacetrain1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 12:56 AM   #7
RobJor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 753
Default

I'd suggest the last, yard shot, is the most compelling unless they pull out the shadows rejection thing. There is a lot of detail, good light, background. Not sure I get the contrast rejections on that except the hills are a little washed out and somewhat blend into the sky.

Bob
RobJor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 01:23 AM   #8
Decapod401
Senior Member
 
Decapod401's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 423
Default

I agree with Kevin, Loyd and Joseph - your work behind the viewfinder is markedly better than when you started. I think that you would do yourself a favor by taking your time when editing. You are seeing problems with your photos after a rejection, and then making corrections. Make a checklist of all of the rejections that your receive, and make sure that you have covered all of those issues when editing each image before initial submission. Your acceptance rate will go up, making you feel better, and your rejection rate will go down, eventually making the screeners look more favorably on your submissions. Continually submitting flawed images makes the screener expect flaws on the next submission.
__________________
Doug Lilly

My RP Pics are HERE.

I've now got a Flickr. account, too.
Decapod401 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2019, 09:48 PM   #9
ShortlinesUSA
Senior Member
 
ShortlinesUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 821
Default

First two? Kind of "meh" for me. But the 3rd really caught my eye. Surprised that didn't make it in. I'll pile on and just say you are getting much better. Good to see you upping your game and not following the masses over on social media saying how much this site sucks because they reject your photos.
__________________
Mike Derrick

Shortline and Regional RR forum moderator
ShortlinesUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.