Old 05-19-2016, 07:13 PM   #1
amtrak07t
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 68
Default Cracking the whip on cloudy days

A few months ago, it was fairly easy to get a cloudy day photograph accepted...as long as you didn't blow out the highlights.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphot...=568726&nseq=7
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphot...552864&nseq=38

Now it seems as if I'm being dinged left and right for cloudy weather, which sort of seems out of the ordinary.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...57&key=4820230
http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...83&key=2819866

Of course, I'm not arguing the rejection. It's easily justified, but it seems like both of the accepted photos would be rejected had I submitted them in the past two weeks or so. Anyone else notice this?
amtrak07t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 07:27 PM   #2
conrail1990
Senior Member
 
conrail1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Delaware
Posts: 204
Default

The SWP photo I thing should be accepted Personally. The Amtrak heritage unit, not so much. Its way to dark and the cropping is bad.
__________________
Evan Schilling
My Photos on RP.
My Photos for sale
conrail1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 07:45 PM   #3
ShortlinesUSA
Senior Member
 
ShortlinesUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 821
Default

Seconded on the cropping issue with the Amtrak shot. I think cloudy may have just been a generic and quick rejection while going through the pile.

I'm on the fence with the SWP shot. The light is not the issue, IMO, and if truly was a cloudy rejection (that is, the screener saw that as the only issue and this photo otherwise would have been accepted) I would disagree. However, even though as a hardcore shortline fan, something on the composition in this one isn't working for me. Possibly too much of the rear of the lead loco blocked. But it didn't make me leap out of my chair and shout "BS!!!" as a rejection.

Cloudy seems 50-50 to me on rejects. Probably just a matter of who sees them. The Cassandra shot is wonderful, IMO, and I'm glad it's in the database. Very artistic, and minimal sky involved (although good texture to what's there) shows a well-executed cloudy day shot.
__________________
Mike Derrick

Shortline and Regional RR forum moderator
ShortlinesUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 07:54 PM   #4
amtrak07t
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 68
Default



That Amtrak shot was still better than my other shot taken a week ago!
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphot...=576381&nseq=1

Side note...anyone know how to properly attach photos?

Last edited by amtrak07t; 05-19-2016 at 07:56 PM.
amtrak07t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2016, 08:24 PM   #5
JRMDC
Senior Member
 
JRMDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,202
Default

SWP: dark is one thing, important dark is another. You have a potentially interesting scene under the station roof, but it's a little dark to fully appreciate it. I'm not saying I can't see certain details, because I can see everything; I am saying that there is a difference between "bright overcast dark" and "in the shadows dark."

Amtrak: has a dark feel to it. It isn't wrong, but with the sky mostly hidden, so the setting is mostly the dark woods, it feels much darker than the Jersey Central shot even though I am thinking they are both exposed and processed in about the same way.

If it doesn't matter to you much, I am thinking if you increase exposure/brightness by a half stop and both get in.
__________________
My RP pix are here.
My Flickr pix are here.

My commentaries on rail pictures are in my blog.

RP Photo Albums:
Cabooses
Engine Details
Farm and Train
Plumes!
Railroad Details
Signal Details
Switchstand Shots
JRMDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 02:44 PM   #6
Mberry
Senior Member
 
Mberry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Montreal, Qc
Posts: 639
Default

This is nothing new IMO. Cloudy shots getting on or not is at the whim of the screener.
Mberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 04:04 PM   #7
troy12n
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333
Default

The first 2 would have gotten on if the light was better. But it's not, so no...

Using some screener that accepted something they shouldnt as criteria for your shots getting on is bogus.
troy12n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2016, 04:27 AM   #8
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amtrak07t View Post
Now it seems as if I'm being dinged left and right for cloudy weather, which sort of seems out of the ordinary.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...57&key=4820230
Cloudy is a must with shots like this. There must be something more specifically unappealing about it with the screener.

Image © Jim Thias
PhotoID: 432756
Photograph © Jim Thias
__________________
.
Rhymes with slice, rice and mice, and probably should be spelled like "Tice."

This pretty much sums it up: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Thias
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2016, 08:14 AM   #9
3375
Junior Member
 
3375's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 8
Default

Brandon, with your Amtrak 145 shot; no chance. Or if you're going to attempt sheer white sky photos on here - get creative and try to not include as much as sky as you possbily can. Go look through Robert A. Shook's photostream (aka the RP wedgie king), and you can get a general idea of what to try, especially at a location he has frequented constantly over the years.

Brian
3375 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 01:37 PM   #10
JimThias
Senior Member
 
JimThias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3375 View Post
Brandon, with your Amtrak 145 shot; no chance.
In post #4 above is that accepted AMTK 145 photo.
__________________
.
Rhymes with slice, rice and mice, and probably should be spelled like "Tice."

This pretty much sums it up: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Thias
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 12:20 AM   #11
amtrak07t
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimThias View Post
In post #4 above is that accepted AMTK 145 photo.
Yeah, they did accept it. It seems that they will accept a cloudy photo if you cut the majority of the sky out, even if it is an overcast. Yet, if there's adequate contrast among the clouds, they'll reject it about 70% of the time.
Now, I may be in the majority, but I'd rather have a better composed cloudy day shot than a 3/4 wedgie with good lighting.


Freddy Shook is one of my personal friends!
amtrak07t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2016, 12:23 AM   #12
amtrak07t
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 68
Default

I eventually resubmitted the SWP shot and it was accepted at some point. I brightened it, thanks JRMDC.


http://www.railpictures.net/photo/581011/
http://www.railpictures.net/photo/581011/

Last edited by amtrak07t; 09-03-2016 at 12:25 AM.
amtrak07t is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.