Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-31-2017, 11:13 PM   #38
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,333

Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
Serious question. How does one define consistency when this web site has multiple screeners working on photographs and criteria that is nothing but subjective? I don't understand what kind of consistency folks are expecting other than that their shots always get on.
Some of it (poor aesthetic quality) is subjective

Some of it (no light on nose, unlevel, etc) is absolutely objective

Some specifically that I linked as comparisons absolutely positively fail the objective, evidence based analysis and site guideline (rule) that there be light on the nose

If photos were purely screened for artistic (subjective) content, you would have more of an argument, but when photos are routinely rejected for objective reasons, and others, which fit the same description are approved, you have the situation we have

Same thing with the screened photo comments. Some comments are rejected for nebulous reasons, while others which contain phrases like "your photo sucks cock" are approved...
troy12n is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.