Old 09-01-2010, 10:57 PM   #1
Mgoldman
Senior Member
 
Mgoldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,641
Default New Bridge coming to Letchworth (NS/CP)

NS is hoping to (finally) replace the trestle at Letchworth State Park (the Grand Canyon of NY) in the near(?) future due to structural issues and capacity.

The new bridge will support an industry standard 286,000 lbs per rail car and will be an arch span.

Get your pics now! And the PC's that go along with them.
Remember to stop by the near by Arcade and Attica Steam line!


http://www.gbnrtc.org/fileadmin/cont...esentation.pdf

/Mitch
Mgoldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2010, 12:24 AM   #2
PLEzero
Senior Member
 
PLEzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pittsburgh,PA
Posts: 675
Default

Hopefully they build it at a slightly better angle.
__________________
Brad Morocco
Candyland, PA
My Flickr Photos
My RP.net Photos
PLEzero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2010, 09:09 PM   #3
jnohallman
Senior Member
 
jnohallman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,527
Default

I have to say their conceptual image of the replacement span actually looks pretty nice. I was expecting something ugly that would really ruin the appearance of the location, but dare I say I actually like the idea for the new span better than the appearance of the current one?

Jon
__________________
"Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it." - Mark Twain

Click here to see my photos on RP.net!

Do not, under any circumstances whatsoever, click here. Don't even think about it. I'm warning you!
jnohallman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 01:39 PM   #4
crazytiger
Senior Member
 
crazytiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NS Greenville District
Posts: 1,473
Default

I like the look of the new bridge, but it looks like you might lose sight of the trucks. I don't know.
__________________
Peter Lewis | Portfolio | Profile | Flickr | Facebook

Canon EOS 40D
Canon EF 50 f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L USM
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM


Quote:
Originally Posted by A Friend
everytime i see non-train photos of yours i think, "so much talent. wasted on trains."
crazytiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 08:14 AM   #5
DWHonan
Senior Member
 
DWHonan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazytiger View Post
but it looks like you might lose sight of the trucks
*bangs head against the wall*

Who cares whether the trucks will be obscured? Let's give NS credit for concluding that this line can be a strategic link in their east-west and north-south networks, and for deciding to make the capital investment to construct a replacement span at the location instead of throwing up their hands, re-routing traffic elsewhere and abandoning a significant chunk of the Tier. It's going to be one heck of an engineering feat to build a new bridge over that gorge, and I for one can't wait to see what form the new bridge takes, regardless of whether they choose another tower bridge or a massive deck arch or even to replicate Robert Stephenson's Britannia Railway Bridge.
__________________
Dave Honan
Issaquah, WA
View my portfolio at RailPictures.net
View my portfolio at Flickr Not quite so new anymore!
DWHonan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 05:49 PM   #6
crazytiger
Senior Member
 
crazytiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NS Greenville District
Posts: 1,473
Default

It is in the proposal, did you see it or is that just a rendering of one option. About the trucks, I don't really care whether you can or not, but RP does. That is why I said it.
__________________
Peter Lewis | Portfolio | Profile | Flickr | Facebook

Canon EOS 40D
Canon EF 50 f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L USM
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM


Quote:
Originally Posted by A Friend
everytime i see non-train photos of yours i think, "so much talent. wasted on trains."
crazytiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2010, 06:58 PM   #7
DWHonan
Senior Member
 
DWHonan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazytiger View Post
It is in the proposal, did you see it or is that just a rendering of one option.
That appears to be simply a rendering; according to NYSDOT's site, the project has only been completed through the scoping phase:
https://www.nysdot.gov/divisions/ope...l/portageville
Final alignment and structure type won't be determined until the engineering analysis is complete.

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazytiger View Post
About the trucks, I don't really care whether you can or not, but RP does. That is why I said it.
It's such a fallacy to tailor one's photographic pursuits to the standards of this website.
__________________
Dave Honan
Issaquah, WA
View my portfolio at RailPictures.net
View my portfolio at Flickr Not quite so new anymore!
DWHonan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 02:39 AM   #8
crazytiger
Senior Member
 
crazytiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NS Greenville District
Posts: 1,473
Default

You are right on the first one (I missed that, good eye) but I said that "I don't really care," but in the context of this site the trucks may be important. I do however fall largely victim in general to shooting in the context of this site, because this is where I have learned what good photography is, so what is pleasing to my eye is extremely similar to "what would get on RP." I am getting over this eventually will get there I assume.
__________________
Peter Lewis | Portfolio | Profile | Flickr | Facebook

Canon EOS 40D
Canon EF 50 f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L USM
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM


Quote:
Originally Posted by A Friend
everytime i see non-train photos of yours i think, "so much talent. wasted on trains."
crazytiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2010, 10:17 PM   #9
Photoshooter09
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 50
Default

This has been circulating for some time now. Please keep in mind that NY State is not the best friend of rail infrastructure (Also, extremely high taxes on rail property). I seriously doubt that the State will cough up that much cash to fix/replace the Portageville trestle.
__________________
Rail Transportation Specialist/ Consultant
Photoshooter09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2010, 02:04 PM   #10
chuckman
Senior Member
 
chuckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Western New York
Posts: 294
Default

Stuff like this has been rumored since the 1980s, and this is just another step into what might become reality if NS can actually get cooperation from all involved.
__________________
"One thing you can surely depend on with crossing gates-you can't depend on them!" -Conrail Signal Maintainer

My photos on flickr...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/53728467@N08/
chuckman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2010, 02:08 PM   #11
chuckman
Senior Member
 
chuckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Western New York
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PLEzero View Post
Hopefully they build it at a slightly better angle.
Now that I think about it...
http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=322495
it doesn't look quite right! Yes, the level on my tripod was in the center!
__________________
"One thing you can surely depend on with crossing gates-you can't depend on them!" -Conrail Signal Maintainer

My photos on flickr...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/53728467@N08/
chuckman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.