Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-05-2011, 03:06 AM   #35
Senior Member
JimThias's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800

Originally Posted by troy12n View Post
I dont think that would lower the cost one bit. Just like some people say they dont use video and would want a DSLR without video. Well, the money was spent on the R&D, at this point, adding some of these functions to DSLR's is a trivial thing, and it would not save you any money at all.
Yeah, ok, a bare-bones, minimal-feature DSLR would cost as much as the loaded Cadillac. Got it. I'll give up my dream then.
Rhymes with slice, rice and mice, and probably should be spelled like "Tice."

This pretty much sums it up:
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.