Thread: RAW Format
View Single Post
Old 09-14-2005, 09:35 PM   #11
trainmonster
Senior Member
 
trainmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 378
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ween
Somewhere I thought I picked up that you want to minimize the number of times you save. But what you guys seem to be saying is that the conversion to TIFF, post-processing, and then saving back as JPEG results in less image quality loss than just post-processing as a JPEG right out of the camera. Is that right?

BTW, I have the ability to shoot RAW, but I don't. I'm sure one day when I finally try it out, I'll wish I had a Delorean to go back in time and kick myself for shooting JPEG all this time. I'm just hesitant to make the plunge and try it...
Well... at least you have the option. Poverty sucks. I read somewhere that repeated saving of .jpg deteriorates quality and .tiff does not. So I started saving as .tiff based on that.

Rich
__________________
"Truck trailers belong on flatcars"
trainmonster is offline   Reply With Quote