Thread: Camera Question
View Single Post
Old 12-05-2011, 03:06 AM   #101
Senior Member
JimThias's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9,800

Originally Posted by troy12n View Post
I dont think that would lower the cost one bit. Just like some people say they dont use video and would want a DSLR without video. Well, the money was spent on the R&D, at this point, adding some of these functions to DSLR's is a trivial thing, and it would not save you any money at all.
Yeah, ok, a bare-bones, minimal-feature DSLR would cost as much as the loaded Cadillac. Got it. I'll give up my dream then.
Rhymes with slice, rice and mice, and probably should be spelled like "Tice."

This pretty much sums it up:
JimThias is offline   Reply With Quote