RailPictures.Net Forums

RailPictures.Net Forums (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/index.php)
-   Railroad Photography Forum (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Bloody dawn - too candyland? (http://www.railpictures.net/forums/showthread.php?t=16928)

troy12n 02-15-2014 03:21 AM

Bloody dawn - too candyland?
 
Dark seems to be in right now, so thought I would give this one a shot

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...78&key=6479407

Too jacked up?

And on a completely unrelated note, is this really that bad?

http://www.railpictures.net/viewreje...96&key=5468155

Moffat Road 02-15-2014 03:35 AM

Troy,

On the first, I don’t think the colors are too jacked up at all.

On the second photo, I’m not sure why they are labeling it PIQ. Maybe someone doesn’t like a strong tele of a steam locomotive…

Mike Danneman

bigbassloyd 02-15-2014 03:41 AM

I'm not seeing a color issue on the first, but you gotta big nuked spot on the right in the sky. And yes, the steam shot is noisy, blurry, and generally lacking of image quality.

On a side note, I hate those stupid power lines that ruin the scene in Bluefield.

And a second side note, your Bluefield shot is unlevel :D

Loyd L.

troy12n 02-15-2014 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigbassloyd (Post 175485)
I'm not seeing a color issue on the first, but you gotta big nuked spot on the right in the sky.

Maybe if there was some snow on the ground, it would be ok :wink:

Quote:

On a side note, I hate those stupid power lines that ruin the scene in Bluefield.
Yea, that pisses me off too

Quote:

And a second side note, your Bluefield shot is unlevel
Horribly too, that will be fixed

bigbassloyd 02-15-2014 03:56 AM

I think I may just visit that bridge in the morning. Pokey always looks good in white...

Loyd L.

troy12n 02-15-2014 04:13 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by bigbassloyd (Post 175488)
I think I may just visit that bridge in the morning. Pokey always looks good in white...

I about killed myself in January 2010 up there. Wont do that again without chains and 4 wheel drive. And I didn't even go off the beaten path.

At any rate, how about this? It's sitting in queue

http://forums.railpictures.net/attac...1&d=1392438859

Mgoldman 02-15-2014 04:18 AM

I'm with Mike - I'm always bewildered by the randomness of the intense scrutiny on certain images screened on RP.

Maybe better yet simple rejection reasons are absent on RP.

"Clipped" /though they could've used "Overexposed" for the nuked sky on the first image.

"Heat Distortion" - looks like it's effecting the entire image vs just above the engine as the scene looks a bit soft overall. 'Course, I guess they could've used "foreground obstructions, lol... "heat distortion".

/Mitch

Mgoldman 02-15-2014 04:22 AM

Your "in the queue now shot" looks like bad color depth this time around. Where you "filled in" the blown white sky - it looks more like a solid color fill as opposed to the translucent gradient of blues in the sky on the left.

/Mitch

troy12n 02-15-2014 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mgoldman (Post 175491)
Your "in the queue now shot" looks like bad color depth this time around. Where you "filled in" the blown white sky - it looks more like a solid color fill as opposed to the translucent gradient of blues in the sky on the left.

Look again, it sure looks a lot better in photoshop than after the jpeg conversion

nikos1 02-15-2014 05:33 AM

Not a fan of the way the engines are blurred on the first one, too short of an an exposure for me.
Second, yeah its bad but could always be worse....:roll:
[photoid=456570]

CSX1702 02-15-2014 05:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikos1 (Post 175493)
Not a fan of the way the engines are blurred on the first one, too short of an an exposure for me.
Second, yeah its bad but could always be worse....:roll:
[photoid=456570]

I would've loved to have been there and take that picture myself. Its an interesting scene that's been butchered.

stlgevo51 02-15-2014 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikos1 (Post 175493)
Not a fan of the way the engines are blurred on the first one, too short of an an exposure for me.
Second, yeah its bad but could always be worse....:roll:
[photoid=456570]

It sucks that the image quality is so poor for this shot. How often do you see three diesels lined up that perfectly?

Troy, your second shot does suffer from some quality issues, but there are a lot of shots on this site that are far worse than it.

MassArt Images 02-15-2014 12:35 PM

Congrats on getting it on! However, toggling between the accepted image and the first rejected one you showed us here, I can't see much difference between them. What did you tweak to make it acceptable?:o

troy12n 02-15-2014 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MassArt Images (Post 175498)
Congrats on getting it on! However, toggling between the accepted image and the first rejected one you showed us here, I can't see much difference between them. What did you tweak to make it acceptable?:o

2 things really:

- I leveled it
- I played around with levels and saturation in the washed out area on the upper right of the frame in the sky

If you look at both side by side, you can see it. Also, the second helper (trailing unit) is the Interstate unit, that's why it got on :lol:

loomus78 02-15-2014 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stlgevo51 (Post 175495)
It sucks that the image quality is so poor for this shot. How often do you see three diesels lined up that perfectly?

[photoid=395186]
At Hagerstown? Quite a bit actually... Above is a scene with two. A third was switching in the yard.

troy12n 02-15-2014 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loomus78 (Post 175503)
[photoid=395186]
At Hagerstown? Quite a bit actually... Above is a scene with two. A third was switching in the yard.

If it's so common and accessible, you would think there would be better shots submitted.

troy12n 02-15-2014 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mgoldman (Post 175490)
I'm with Mike - I'm always bewildered by the randomness of the intense scrutiny on certain images screened on RP.

Or the complete lack of scrutiny on others.

See This thread.

I'm not gonna cry too much about that shot of 630, I got a bunch of shots from that trip on, and cant really complain too much about it. It just kind of bugs me when I see stuff like this get on and a shot of mine, which is much better IQ does not
[photoid=469948]
There's a few things wrong with this one, and it's not a knock on the photog, he has a lot of interesting older shots on, but this one, I dont know why he even submitted, especially as-is

Holloran Grade 02-15-2014 05:02 PM

I was going to suggest on the first to up the saturation a tad and up the contrast slightly.

On the second - not a big fan of portrait format, but you could chop the left side off a bit to move the train out of the dreaded center spot.

Framing it off the tree on the right might also work if you have some frames with more on the right.

Mgoldman 02-16-2014 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by troy12n (Post 175505)
It just kind of bugs me when I see stuff like this get on and a shot of mine, which is much better IQ does not
[photoid=469948]

With a bazillion images in the queue, the screener probably didn't check the date and gave Tom a free pass on an SP image that looked much older then it was (1980). No problem for me - I find value in RP as a database probably just as much (if not more) then a site with "The BEST railroad photos on the net". Remove 80% of the wrecks, rosters and Darwin's and I'll re-evalute my statement - actually, no - leave it all, it has MUCH more value as usually is.

/Mitch

Ron Flanary 02-17-2014 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mgoldman (Post 175526)
With a bazillion images in the queue, the screener probably didn't check the date and gave Tom a free pass on an SP image that looked much older then it was (1980). No problem for me - I find value in RP as a database probably just as much (if not more) then a site with "The BEST railroad photos on the net". Remove 80% of the wrecks, rosters and Darwin's and I'll re-evalute my statement - actually, no - leave it all, it has MUCH more value as usually is.

/Mitch

I agree. You can't compare a slide image from 1980 to something you shot with a digital camera yesterday. Apples and oranges. For sure, if this shot had been taken with a digital camera yesterday, it wouldn't have been accepted. But---older shots like this get some latitude, and for good reason.

loomus78 02-18-2014 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by troy12n (Post 175504)
If it's so common and accessible, you would think there would be better shots submitted.

*shrug*
I've never really thought about it until Jake mentioned it. As far as it being accessible, it's very accessible. The parking lot is shared by both CSX and the Hagerstown Roundhouse Museum. It's posted but I've never heard of any trouble hanging around for a few minutes to take a photo or eat dinner in the car while waiting for a child's practice to end. Folks that have gotten in trouble didn't pay attention to where by almost getting hit by the crew vans or CSX trucks or they crossed the tracks.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.